Vol. 6, No. 1
Winter / Spring 2007

Jerry Bylander, Editor  jerryby@cableone.net

FEATURE ARTICLES

The Director's Column


Sorry
about no newsletter in the winter.  I am combining the Winter and Spring editions here.  I have sent all our members the article, "To Test or Not To Test" in the "In The Know" newsletter.  The basic conclusions are that PSA doubling time is the critical variable and if PSA rises more than .35ng/ml per year you are at major risk.  Get your first PSA at age 40 to set a baseline, and (I have recommended, in the past, testing every 5 years until 65 and then test every year) testing every year there after.

Cancer test.  I am including an article on a new cancer test from the LA times.  Henri tells me this test has been around for a couple of years, but many doctors don't know about it yet.  Some who do fail to use it, and we suspect that some don't have a clue;  that is those that tell you "PSA has no value".

Have a nice spring!  Jerry Bylander


Prostate Cancer Test's Accuracy Cited

New exam could cut the number of unneeded biopsies, a study finds.

By Susan Brink, LA Times Staff Writer
April 26, 2007  Copyright, 2007  Los Angeles Times.  Reprinted with permission.

A new prostate test that relies on measuring levels of a blood protein called EPCA-2 accurately found cancer 94% of the time, a significant improvement over the current PSA test, according to a study released Wednesday.

Each year, about 1.6 million men undergo biopsies because they test positive on a PSA test — but only about 230,000 of them actually have cancer.

The new test for EPCA-2 — or early prostate cancer antigen — not only detected prostate cancer but also determined whether it had spread to other parts of the body, according to the study published in the journal Urology.

"It could allow us to help patients decide if they need a biopsy or if it's tame or has the ability to invade outside the prostate," said Robert H. Getzenberg, director of research at the James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore and a coauthor of the study.

The test still faces large-scale clinical trials and review by the Food and Drug Administration, but it could be available in early 2008, said Getzenberg, who is a consultant to Seattle-based Onconome Inc., which is developing the test technology.

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in men after lung cancer, according to the American Cancer Society. About 27,000 die from prostate cancer a year, the society said.

Rectal examination and the PSA — or prostate specific antigen — test, which was approved in 1994, have been the primary methods of detecting the cancer.

But questions about the accuracy of the PSA test have been building. It has a high level of false positives and misses about 15% of prostate cancers.

Many false positive results require patients to undergo a biopsy, an unpleasant surgical procedure where prostate samples are taken for analysis.

Another problem is that the PSA test does not distinguish between the cancer's aggressive form, which is frequently fatal, and a slow-growing form that patients can safely live with.

"The PSA is a flawed marker. Everybody agrees with that," said Dr. Laurence Klotz, chief of urology at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center in Toronto. "The search for a better marker is intense."

In hunting down a new marker, Getzenberg said his team found that the EPCA-2 protein was structurally different in cancerous and normal prostate cells.

The researchers measured the EPCA-2 levels in the blood of 385 men who were known have cancer or were free of it.

Men who had an elevated EPCA-2 test indeed had cancer 94% of the time, compared with only about 19% of men with an elevated PSA result, reported in previous studies. The test falsely sounded an alarm 3% of the time, according to the report.

The EPCA-2 test missed about 6% of existing cancers. The PSA test misses about 15% of existing cancers, according to previous studies.

"It's pretty exciting," said Dr. Mark Scholz, a Marina del Rey oncologist specializing in prostate cancer. "PSA testing has led to over-treatment. With a more accurate test like this, one of the big pluses right away would be fewer biopsies."

But Scholz said the PSA still has value. "If you do two tests, you have a greater likelihood of finding the truth," he said.

Other prostate tests are in the pipeline, including a urine-based genetic test and another blood test.


susan.brink at latimes.com

Back to Top

Next Meeting


Date:   Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Time:  6:30 pm - Social & Coffee  7:00 pm - Program
Location:
  Classroom 1
,  Wilson N. Jones, 500 N. Highland, Sherman, TX  
                            
SPEAKER: Dr. Larry Barker, Sherman Cancer Center

TOPIC:   Dr. Barker will bring us up to date on the available treatments for failed therapies for growing prostate cancer.

ABOUT THE SPEAKER: Dr. Barker is a local oncologist and has spoken to our group several times.

ABOUT THE PROGRAM:   The program will cover the available radiation and chemo therapies for failed ADT treatments among others.

New Meeting Plans:  We plan to continue our telephone tree to help get the word out.  We will ask those who want us to continue meeting, to take some names and call before the next meeting.  Please send us names and phone numbers of interested men. 

As always the group does not recommend any particular treatment, therapy, physician, or hospital. US Too! Sherman is a prostate cancer group formed for the purpose of sharing information, education, and mutual support.

 

Back to Top

Last Meeting


SPEAKER
: MR. R. B. McGowan.  He is the founder of our group
Date:   Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Time:  6:30 pm - Social & Coffee  7:00 pm - Program
Location:
  Classroom 1
,  Wilson N. Jones, 500 N. Highland, Sherman, TX

TOPIC:  Surviving systemic prostate cancer

R. B. McGowen, the founder of the  Texoma USToo! Prostate Cancer support group shared how he has not just survived but flourished with metastasized prostate cancer.

Back to Top

Other Important Events

Your organization's meetings listed here.  Contact the Editor at jerryby@cableone.net .

Back to Top

Editor's Notes


Material posted here is intended for educational purposes only and must not be considered a substitute for informed medical advice from your own physician.

 Jerry Bylander, Editor

Back to Top