| |
| Vol. 3, No. 3 |
March 2004 |
|
Jerry Bylander, Editor jerryby@cableone.net |
| The Director's Column |
|
| Next Meeting |
|
6:30 PM - Social &
Coffee Speaker:
Dr.
Mary Hebert, Texas Cancer Center- Program: We
will tour the Cancer Center facilities and see the radiation therapy area.
We will learn the latest results from radiation therapy treatments for prostate cancer. |
| Last Meeting |
| Date & Time: | Tuesday, January 20, 2004, 7:00 PM |
| Place: | Wilson N. Jones, North Campus |
| Attendance: | approximately 20 attendees |
|
None New Business None. Program: ""Systemic Prostate Cancer: current treatments and controls", Dr. Barker also briefly discussed the new prostate cancer vaccines now entering phase III trials. Speaker: Dr. Larry Barker, Texas Oncology, Sherman Cancer Center and Denison Denison Cancer Center Program: Dr. Barker did an excellent review of prostate cancer and the various treatments. The meeting adjourned about 9 PM. Henri Plunkett, Program Chair/by the Editor |
| Other Important Events |
| Your organization's meetings listed here. Contact the Editor at jerryby@cableone.net |
| Editor's Notes |
Thoughts from your editor or others ABOUT PROSTATE CANCER When a man is diagnosed with prostate cancer all he really wants to know is how to fix me. I agree that is the situation, so now please somebody tell me what to do. If it was that easy there would not be pc advocates all over the world to try to help newly diagnosed men with this situation. If one wants the perfect answer to his situation, there is some homework he will need to do for himself. First he needs to listen and understand his physicians views and ask why the physician has made this determination. Second he needs support from others who have been down this road such as prostate cancer support groups. Third he needs to assimilate all information he can readily receive and an honest understanding of this data. MOST IMPORTANT of all is to make a determination whether the cancer is more likely than not, organ-confined. If that determination is made, almost any therapy recommended in the hands of an artist, (not all doctors have the same skill levels, as in all of life) will probably cure. If the cancer is not most likely organ-confined, there are still effective therapies that provide years of overall survival benefits. Now here is the 64,000 dollar question. How does anybody really know if the cancer is confined or not? The answer is they do not for sure know, and this is scary to most men as it should be. Now through information available, one can determine through probabilities, the percentage of organ confinement or not. So how should one trust an attending physician with his determination? Same answer as in most of life, be skeptical. Make your physician get very specific about his determinations and why. Second, always get a second opinion. Make sure your decisions are based on the most current information and not your gut feelings. What if you don't trust your own decisions or even the physician that is attending? Move on to the best doctors who specialize in just prostate cancer, whom are found at teaching hospitals, such as johns hopkins, md anderson, sloan kettering, mayo. The biggest problem men have to date, is doctors putting men through therapies to treat the cancer locally when it has already spread outside the prostate. This is the obstacle to overcome when making ones decisions, as little could be as dreary as having been treated for prostate cancer, only to have it immediately return. I can think of no better way to end this article than to tell you to attend local prostate cancer support groups where men are determined to help newly diagnosed as well as recurring prostate cancer persons. Support group persons are not physicians and give and share information only, however many meetings have physicians attending who do give medical advice and opinions, free of charge as well as the meetings one attends are free of charge. Now take charge and make the right decisions for you.............................henri plunkett Back to Editor's Notes Since the
object of radiating the prostate is to target enough radiation to kill all
the prostate cells and therefore not just stun them, one would like to
weaken or stun them before radiation therapy. The pre-radiation weakening
is thought by some to be possible through the use of hormone therapy.
However there some controversy here (I go on the theory that if the
benefits offset the disadvantages - do it. Editor). Some doctors cite
studies that show overall survival benefits are never seen for such
pre-radiation use. Now my opinion is this, most of these studies never
compare apples to apples to apples, such as A) treating
100 men with radical prostatectomy (surgery) with any Gleason score and
finding the percent failed and cured to B) the same outcomes for
studies with radiation or C) radiation plus pre-radiation hormonal
therapy. (If you want to explore this issue further, please question
our speakers at the appropriate time in one of our meetings. Editor). News You Can Use You can find news you can use at the USToo International web site: http://www.ustoo.org/. Check it out for the latest references. Jerry Bylander - Newsletter Editor |